Vai al contenuto principale
Italiano (it)
Русский (ru)
Українська (uk)
Deutsch (de_old)
English (de)
English (en)
Español - Internacional (es)
Français (fr)
Italiano (it)
Polski (pl)
Log In
Academic Writing
Cerca corsi
Corsi
Аспірантура
Academic Writing
Argomento 1
Lecture 2. Reviewing process or how to benefit fro...
Lecture 2. Reviewing process or how to benefit from negative responses?
Per visualizzare il file, fai click su questo link:
2 - Reviewing process or how to benefit from negative responses_.pdf
Attività precedente
Lecture 1. Good and Bad Manuscripts
Next Activity
Lecture 3. Your scientific profile
Vai a...
Vai a...
Форум новин
Discussions on Writing a Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journal
Ermolayev, V., Keberle, N., Borue, S. Motivating Students and Improving Quality of Learning Using Peer-Reviews. Proc. ICTERI 2012, pp. 164-175.
Writing a Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journal - семінар для аспірантів, оцінюється у 100 балів.
1st homework
2nd homework
3rd homework
Lecture 0. Introduction
Lecture 1. Good and Bad Manuscripts
Lecture 3. Your scientific profile
Lecture 4. Scientometric bases
Lecture 6. Examples